Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

“The Future of Private International Law in Australia” — Seminar in Sydney

May 3, 2011/in /by Perry Herzfeld
image_pdfimage_print

Australian readers, and others who happen to be here on 16 May 2011, may be interested in a seminar to be held at Sydney Law School (Camperdown Campus) on that day from 6-7.30pm.

The seminar is entitled “The Future of Private International Law in Australia”.  The speakers are:

  • The Honourable Justice Paul Le Gay Brereton AM RFD, Judge of the Supreme Court of New South Wales and co-author of Nygh’s Conflict of Laws in Australia (8th ed);
  • Dr Andrew Bell SC, New South Wales Bar and co-author of Nygh’s Conflict of Laws in Australia;
  • Thomas John, head of the Private International Law Section of the Commonwealth Attorney-General’s Department; and
  • Professor Andrew Dickinson, Professor in Private International Law at Sydney Law School and one of the specialist editors of Dicey, Morris & Collins: The Conflict of Laws.

A brochure can be found here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Perry Herzfeld https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Perry Herzfeld2011-05-03 08:00:402011-05-03 08:03:17“The Future of Private International Law in Australia” — Seminar in Sydney

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
Link to: Childress on the Alien Tort Statute and the Next Wave of International Litigation Link to: Childress on the Alien Tort Statute and the Next Wave of International Litigation Childress on the Alien Tort Statute and the Next Wave of International Liti... Link to: First Issue of 2011’s Belgian PIL E-Journal Link to: First Issue of 2011’s Belgian PIL E-Journal First Issue of 2011’s Belgian PIL E-Journal
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top