http://conflictoflaws.net/2009/ecj-recent-judgments-and-references-on-brussels-i-and-brussels-ii-bis/ News and Views in Private International Law Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:33:28 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://conflictoflaws.net/2009/ecj-recent-judgments-and-references-on-brussels-i-and-brussels-ii-bis/comment-page-1/#comment-209190 Philip Smith Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:02:38 +0000 http://conflictoflaws.net/?p=3974#comment-209190 Re C-585/08: the Oberster Gerichtshof has asked substiantially the same question concerning websites in C-144/09: "Is the fact that a website of the party with whom a consumer has concluded a contract can be consulted on the internet sufficient to justify a finding that an activity is being 'directed', within the terms of Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 ('the Brussels I Regulation')?" Re C-585/08: the Oberster Gerichtshof has asked substiantially the same question concerning websites in C-144/09: “Is the fact that a website of the party with whom a consumer has concluded a contract can be consulted on the internet sufficient to justify a finding that an activity is being ‘directed’, within the terms of Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 (‘the Brussels I Regulation’)?”

]]>