<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rome I &#8211; Final Text Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conflictoflaws.net/2008/rome-i-final-text-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conflictoflaws.net/2008/rome-i-final-text-released/</link>
	<description>News and Views in Private International Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:33:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michaël</title>
		<link>http://conflictoflaws.net/2008/rome-i-final-text-released/comment-page-1/#comment-39831</link>
		<dc:creator>Michaël</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 15:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conflictoflaws.net/2008/legislation/rome-i-final-text-released/#comment-39831</guid>
		<description>Such a &#039;purposeful delay&#039; would only be a symbolic gesture I think; in the end, the Rome I Regulation will probably enter into force in the UK and in the rest of Europe at the same time. It would also mean that it would be adopted in the Council under the next presidency. Oh well... the main thing is that I wanted to be absolutely sure that I didn&#039;t miss it being adopted. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such a &#8216;purposeful delay&#8217; would only be a symbolic gesture I think; in the end, the Rome I Regulation will probably enter into force in the UK and in the rest of Europe at the same time. It would also mean that it would be adopted in the Council under the next presidency. Oh well&#8230; the main thing is that I wanted to be absolutely sure that I didn&#8217;t miss it being adopted. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giorgio Buono</title>
		<link>http://conflictoflaws.net/2008/rome-i-final-text-released/comment-page-1/#comment-39824</link>
		<dc:creator>Giorgio Buono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 14:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conflictoflaws.net/2008/legislation/rome-i-final-text-released/#comment-39824</guid>
		<description>The Rome I Reg. was included in the list of &quot;A&quot; items (deliberation without discussion) for the JHA meeting of 17/18 April (see Council doc. n. 8314/08, point 17). This is the last document to mention it. I can only presume that it will be put back on the agenda for the incoming JHA session, on 5/6 June. A provisional agenda is usually released 1/2 days before the meeting, so at the beginning of next week there will probably be more info. A press release was published yesterday by the Slovenian Presidency, on the main topics that will be covered by next JHA Council: while Rome III and the maintenance Reg. are mentioned, nothing is said on Rome I. But this is probably due to its inclusion in the &quot;A&quot; items, so that there is nothing new to discuss.
See http://www.eu2008.si/en/News_and_Documents/Press_Releases/May/0529JHAsvet_napoved.html

From a completely different point of view, can we think of a &quot;purposeful delay&quot; in adopting the act, until the end of the UK&#039;s public consultation on the opting-in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rome I Reg. was included in the list of &#8220;A&#8221; items (deliberation without discussion) for the JHA meeting of 17/18 April (see Council doc. n. 8314/08, point 17). This is the last document to mention it. I can only presume that it will be put back on the agenda for the incoming JHA session, on 5/6 June. A provisional agenda is usually released 1/2 days before the meeting, so at the beginning of next week there will probably be more info. A press release was published yesterday by the Slovenian Presidency, on the main topics that will be covered by next JHA Council: while Rome III and the maintenance Reg. are mentioned, nothing is said on Rome I. But this is probably due to its inclusion in the &#8220;A&#8221; items, so that there is nothing new to discuss.<br />
See <a href="http://www.eu2008.si/en/News_and_Documents/Press_Releases/May/0529JHAsvet_napoved.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.eu2008.si/en/News_and_Documents/Press_Releases/May/0529JHAsvet_napoved.html</a></p>
<p>From a completely different point of view, can we think of a &#8220;purposeful delay&#8221; in adopting the act, until the end of the UK&#8217;s public consultation on the opting-in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michaël</title>
		<link>http://conflictoflaws.net/2008/rome-i-final-text-released/comment-page-1/#comment-39785</link>
		<dc:creator>Michaël</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 09:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conflictoflaws.net/2008/legislation/rome-i-final-text-released/#comment-39785</guid>
		<description>&quot;According to current schedule (see the Rome I OEIL page), the text should be approved by the JHA Council in its meeting of 17/18 April 2008. Further information will be posted as soon as it is available.&quot;

The press release on the 17/18 April JHA meeting doesn&#039;t say anything about Rome I (see http://www.consilium.europa.eu/cms3_applications/Applications/newsRoom/LoadDocument.asp?directory=en/jha/&amp;filename=99991.pdf) and I don&#039;t see any information on the OEIL page either.

Any idea what is going on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;According to current schedule (see the Rome I OEIL page), the text should be approved by the JHA Council in its meeting of 17/18 April 2008. Further information will be posted as soon as it is available.&#8221;</p>
<p>The press release on the 17/18 April JHA meeting doesn&#8217;t say anything about Rome I (see <a href="http://www.consilium.europa.eu/cms3_applications/Applications/newsRoom/LoadDocument.asp?directory=en/jha/&amp;filename=99991.pdf)" rel="nofollow">http://www.consilium.europa.eu/cms3_applications/Applications/newsRoom/LoadDocument.asp?directory=en/jha/&amp;filename=99991.pdf)</a> and I don&#8217;t see any information on the OEIL page either.</p>
<p>Any idea what is going on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El texto definitivo del reglamento Roma I &#171; Àrea de Dret Internacional Privat - UAB</title>
		<link>http://conflictoflaws.net/2008/rome-i-final-text-released/comment-page-1/#comment-28124</link>
		<dc:creator>El texto definitivo del reglamento Roma I &#171; Àrea de Dret Internacional Privat - UAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conflictoflaws.net/2008/legislation/rome-i-final-text-released/#comment-28124</guid>
		<description>[...] a Conflictuslegum y a Conflictoflaws por destacar esta [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a Conflictuslegum y a Conflictoflaws por destacar esta [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
