<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Navigating the Common Law Approach to Cross-Border Insolvency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conflictoflaws.net/2007/navigating-the-common-law-approach-to-cross-border-insolvency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conflictoflaws.net/2007/navigating-the-common-law-approach-to-cross-border-insolvency/</link>
	<description>News and Views in Private International Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:33:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Navigating the Common Law Approach to Cross-Border Insolvency at Insolvencyblog.com</title>
		<link>http://conflictoflaws.net/2007/navigating-the-common-law-approach-to-cross-border-insolvency/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Navigating the Common Law Approach to Cross-Border Insolvency at Insolvencyblog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conflictoflaws.net/2007/articles/navigating-the-common-law-approach-to-cross-border-insolvency/#comment-341</guid>
		<description>[...] Conflict of Laws .Net reports here that Look Chan Ho of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has posted Navigating the Common Law Approach to Cross-Border Insolvency on SSRN. Just when legislations are being put in place around the world to cope with cross-border insolvency (such as the implementation of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency), the UK Privy Council in Cambridge Gas Transport Corporation v Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Navigator Holdings [2006] UKPC 26; [2006] 3 WLR 689 reminds us that the common law remains essential and is capable of development. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Conflict of Laws .Net reports here that Look Chan Ho of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has posted Navigating the Common Law Approach to Cross-Border Insolvency on SSRN. Just when legislations are being put in place around the world to cope with cross-border insolvency (such as the implementation of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency), the UK Privy Council in Cambridge Gas Transport Corporation v Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Navigator Holdings [2006] UKPC 26; [2006] 3 WLR 689 reminds us that the common law remains essential and is capable of development. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
