Conflict of Laws header image

Dornoch & Ors v Mauritius Union Assurance

DORNOCH LTD & ORS v (1) MAURITIUS UNION ASSURANCE CO LTD (2) MAURITIUS COMMERCIAL BANK LTD [2006] EWCA Civ 389

The question before the court was whether reinsurers had a good arguable case that a reinsurance contract did not contain a Mauritian jurisdiction clause and accordingly England was the appropriate forum for the trial of proceedings relating to the reinsurance.

Download the Court of Appeal's judgment from BAILII.

Comments on this entry are closed.